The Strange Case of Origami Yoda: Read it you must.
29 Jul 2011 4 Comments
in Early middle grade, Musings, Targets Boys Tags: boy books, humor books, middle school, Origami Yoda, reluctant readers, Tom Angleberger

There are directions for folding Origami Yoda at the end of the book. Took me a few tries, but behold!
Yes, I made that Yoda finger puppet myself. And, yes, you can, too. Really!
While I understand that you, presumably a grown-up, may have no desire to do so, I can assure you that anyone between the ages of 8-12 is in on making Origami Yoda. So in. They are also so in to reading Tom Angleberger’s book, The Strange Case of Origami Yoda, a comic romp through the absurd and profound that is middle school. You know how sometimes the fact that a blockbuster movie is a blockbuster somehow cheapens it? Well, this book is a bestseller. Let’s say my expectations for its literary value were moderate. Let’s also say I knew my summer book club boys wouldn’t care a lick (or should I say, an i-yoda?) about literary value. Just the cover and the title by themselves are a no-brainer for a teacher like me, trying to hook a bunch of pre-adolescents on the brink of middle school themselves. If the book was a little scant on substance, so be it.
And then, I read it. I was anticipating it would be hilarious, and it is. I knew the format would be engaging, like the Wimpy Kid and Big Nate series, and indeed that is true, also. There are funny, kid-like doodles on all the pages, and each page looks like a crumpled paper that has done time in a backpack. What was less predictable was the great characterization. And even less predictable, it has depth. It has depth! The fact is that at its heart, The Strange Case of Origami Yoda raises radical questions for kids. Is that nerdy loner you all think is a total loser really smarter than anyone in school? No, smarter is the wrong word. Smart in and of itself doesn’t hold much cache in middle school. Is that kid wiser? Is it possible that that kid is not oblivious to middle school norms, but rather quite aware and simply doesn’t care? In other words, is it possible that middle school norms are bull poop?
Whoa.
The narrator, named Tommy, outlines the mystery gripping his circle of friends at vdms: Is Dwight’s origami finger puppet of Yoda magically spouting words of wisdom, or is it just Dwight? Dwight, resident goober of the sixth grade, seems incapable of the kind of psychic, Zen-like advice given by Origami Yoda. This is a guy who generally appears to self-sabotage any chance of winning respect among his peers. He uses his straw to eat hamburgers. He wears a vomit green sweater vest with an orange reindeer on it. He spends a lot of time standing in a hole he dug in his backyard. Yet, when Dwight’s finger puppet of Yoda gives advice, in a rather pathetic imitation of Yoda’s voice, it’s spot on, causing Tommy and his friends to ponder their presuppositions about Dwight. Tommy has particular urgency in getting to the bottom of it all, as he needs some advice about his love interest Sara, and nothing less than his dignity is riding on whether or not Origami Yoda is for real. Hence, Tommy tells us, he has assembled a “case file” of first-hand accounts, gathered from classmates who have benefitted from Origami Yoda’s advice, so as to weigh out the evidence.
What follows is a series of scenarios in which Angleberger expertly captures all that is embarrassing, funny, silly, honest, and guarded about that unique time in life known as sixth grade. In Origami Yoda and the Embarrassing Stain, Kellen spills water on his pants so it looks like he’s peed his pants seconds before he has to enter his homeroom. Yoda’s advice: All of pants you must wet. Tommy splashes water over the rest of his pants, thus avoiding total humiliation (enduring the discomfort is no sweat by comparison). Quavando, plagued by his school-wide nickname “Cheeto Hog” because of an unfortunate choice he made in a vending machine incident, is told by Origami Yoda, Cheetos for everyone you must buy. Indeed, it works. Origami Yoda also correctly predicts who will get kicked off American Idol even though Dwight doesn’t watch TV.
My readers flip-flopped their opinions with each “case,” weighing the evidence and formulating their own theories. There’s a part in most of us, I suspect, that wants Origami Yoda to be magic. But then, there’s another part that wants Dwight to be a genius, too. In the end, Harvey, the cynical tough guy throughout, is hung out to dry. Dwight wins the girl. So does Tommy! And he’s learned to accept Dwight for who he is, in all his eccentric glory. True, the mystery about Origami Yoda remains unresolved. My book clubbers are so glad! Otherwise, there wouldn’t be need for the sequel, which comes out this fall: Darth Paper Strikes Back.
I wonder if I’ll be able to make the Origami Darth Paper.
A Midsummer Night’s Read
19 Jul 2011 2 Comments
in Early middle grade, Experienced Reader/Upper Middle Grade, High interest Tags: Accidental Adventures of India McAllister, ALA Top Ten Rainbow Books, Bank Street Best Children's Books List, Charlotte Agell, children's books on adoption
My friends, I have had a long hibernation from blogging, but it is not because I haven’t been reading. In fact it’s midsummer, which means I’m midway through teaching my summer reading groups, which means, of course, that I’ve got a slew of new books for your favorite 8-12′s. I’m most excited to share The Accidental Adventures of India McAllister, by Charlotte Agell, for a whole bunch of reasons. One of them is that when I contacted Charlotte to let her know who I was and told her I had thirteen girls reading her book, she said she’d love to meet them in person. And she did! (See photos.) Meeting or no, let me tell you why I love this book: it is so honest. It is honest about life, it is honest about age ten, it is honest about the way adventures are usually accidental, not planned.
The character India McAllister is a plucky, adventure-seeking fourth grader growing up in a quiet Maine town. Her family situation is anything but conventional. She is adopted from China (not India), and wishes she knew more Chinese people– heck, any Chinese people. Her mom is an artist who is loving but flakey, sometimes forgetting to make dinner, and proudly displaying a plaster cast of her breast in the living room. India’s parents are divorced, and her father now lives with Richard. Richard is just in the way, as far as India is concerned, and takes up too much of her father’s attention. India’s best friend is a boy, and some kids at school think this is weird.
Okay, people, I know at least one alarm went off in your head in reading that description. If not an alarm, then at least the popping up of your eyebrows. If it weren’t for the masterful handling of the content– completely un-exploitive and utterly, well, honest– I could understand that. But this book made the ALA Top Ten Rainbow List for 2011 as well as the Bank Street College of Education’s 2011 Best Children’s Books List for a reason, and my guess on that reason? India McAllister deals with difficult realities facing children today without overdramatizing them.
Let’s talk about Richard. To India, a fourth grader, it is not foremost in her mind that her dad lives with a man. The thing that bugs her about Richard is the same thing that bugs lots of kids about their parents’ love interests. This person is an intruder and potential rival. A ten-year-old doesn’t think sexually, so the fact Richard is male is unimportant. Jealousy is an all-inclusive emotion. India wouldn’t be any more or less jealous if her father’s lover was female. I’d wager any of India’s readers who are themselves children of divorce can relate to her feelings. In this way, Charlotte Agell quietly promotes tolerance by getting at the universal root emotion, rather than getting hung up on who is what gender. Other readers may connect more immediately, having gay parents themselves. Still more may just recognize a friend or classmate’s family in India’s situation. Same-sex couples are no longer invisible, and I love that Charlotte lets fiction reflect this reality in a politically neutral way. The children can make up their own minds. Or, they may not even pick up on it! I’m not sure my own daughter did, but that may be because she has known same-sex parents and just thinks this is one more kind of family. A brave new world.
Shall I discuss the breast? I cracked right up when I read this part of the story. It comes when India is longing for a mom with a more traditional job, citing the breast on the living room shelf as a reason. The why behind the breast? India’s mom is a breast cancer survivor, and she made the cast right before the surgery– as a sort of homage to loss and strength. Honest. Charlotte brings up something sad that kids hear about. Three out of thirteen of my students shared stories of moms, grandmothers they’d never met, and aunts who’d had breast cancer. Who else writes about this in middle grade fiction and manages not to have it be a major plot point? It’s brilliant.
And, children adopted by parents of different ethnic backgrounds, Charlotte is thinking of you, too. Giving you a voice without making your other-ness define you (or define the plot of this book). When one student of Asian descent (not adopted) told Charlotte at our meeting she could relate to how India wished for more people who looked like her in her town, a little round of applause sounded in my heart.
Yet, somehow, The Accidental Adventures of India McAllister is not an issues book. It is a delightful story of a girl searching for adventure and never quite finding it. A failed UFO sighting attempt. A trumped-up whodunnit mystery around a purse that was simply lost. A mysterious stranger playing a saxophone who turned out to be…a stranger playing a saxophone. And then the accidental adventure itself, where India gets lost in the woods. This book is not tightly plotted, and to me that’s what made it the most honest of all. Being ten doesn’t have rising action, a climax, and resolution. It’s just a series of adventures, large and small. I cannot wait to read more of India’s. Book Two is on the way (release date TBA). Meanwhile, India has a blog of her own.
Get Ahead of the Curve! This Lunch Lady Will Be Played By Amy Poehler.
03 Nov 2010 2 Comments
in Early middle grade, Great Mileage Builder, High interest, Targets Boys Tags: Jarrett J. Krosoczka, Lunch Lady series, middle grade graphic novels
To get in the mood for this post, watch the author’s quick promo for his series.
What crime fighter packs a spork cell phone, fish stick nunchucks, and taco-vision night goggles? Why,
Lunch Lady, of course– “Serving justice and serving lunch!” In this six-book series, Lunch Lady can handle any danger– and we’re not talking runny sloppy joes here. Fishy characters around Thompson Brook School have no idea what they’re up against. She knows martial arts, she scales buildings, she carries whisk whackers and is not afraid to use them. James Bond has Q, and Lunch Lady has Betty, another cafeteria worker with a double life. Betty develops excellent gadgets like hamburger headphones and fancy ketchup packet lasers in their super secret lab housed in the school Boiler Room. When confronted with shocking revelations, Lunch Lady will exclaim things like, “Green beans!” or “Oh, my tater tots!” What’s not to love about Lunch Lady? I ask you.
Krosoczka grounds readers with a healthy dose of the familiar through the characters called “the Breakfast Bunch”– three kids who eat in the cafeteria every morning. Through them, everyday topics like soccer tryouts and bullies are mixed in with preposterous plots such a cyborg substitute taking over the school. What does their lunch lady do when she isn’t slinging Salisbury steak? the Breakfast Bunch wonders. With a little sniffing around, Hector, Terrence, and Dee discover their lunch lady’s time off is action-packed. Lunch Lady and Betty frequently rely on the kids to seal the deal on crime, which is a departure from the classic, untouchable superhero, like say, Batman. I like how these books empower kids in that way.
Heads up, parents and teachers of reluctant readers! There’s a lot being written about the value of graphic novels for developing readers out of non-readers these days. The preponderance of current wisdom says, YES! Give kids graphic novels to encourage literacy (make sure they’re age appropriate, of course). Series like Krosoczka’s Lunch Lady get kids in books. The librarian where I teach says she can’t keep them on the shelves. Hooray for the Lunch Lady! Apparently, Amy Poehler agrees.
She’s has an interest in the series, and plans to star in the upcoming movie. I bet that makes real life lunch ladies everywhere smile.
Toys Go Out: Timeless Theme, Original Cast
24 Oct 2010 2 Comments
in Early middle grade, Great Mileage Builder Tags: Emily Jenkins, middle grade books, Toys Go Out
Toys Go Out taps into a classic childhood fantasy: What do my toys do when I’m not looking? Winnie the Pooh, The Velveteen Rabbit, Pinocchio, Corduroy, Raggedy Ann and Andy are fixtures in the children’s lit canon for a good reason. To the child at a certain point in development, it’s more unimaginable that the toys aren’t alive than that they are. The “Pink Bear” my eight-year-old daughter has been dragging around since toddlerhood is much more to her than the now dishwater-gray polyester pile of flattened plush my husband and I see.
Emily Jenkins masterfully taps into that magical childhood mindspace and brings to life toys in the very same way a child does. As promised on the cover, the book chronicles the adventures of a stuffed stingray, a “toughy little buffalo” named Lumphy, and “someone called Plastic.” The book is organized into six stand-alone chapters. But, reading them consecutively guarantees you fall in love with the hodgepodge cast.
Stingray is neurotic and overcompensates by being a know-it-all whose facts are questionable. In the first chapter, when the principals are stuffed in their little girl’s backpack and don’t know where they are going, Stingray becomes convinced they are headed for the dump (kind of like Stuart Little). From that single assumption, she spirals to, “We’ll be tossed in a pile of old green beans and sour milk cartons…it will be full of garbage-eating sharks, and it will smell like throw-up.” Stingray is the character who voices the fears that pop into the minds of most of us, but we’re too sensible or embarrassed to utter them. She cracks third graders up.
Lumphy the buffalo, meanwhile, is a rugged cowboy with a vulnerable side. He’s plagued by the fear that he’s not a real buffalo, and is given to aggression towards Stingray. Why does Stingray get to sleep on the High Bed with the Little Girl while the rest of the toys are stuck on the floor? In the chapter “How Lumphy Got on the Big High Bed and Lost Something Rather Good-looking,” he confronts Stingray but loses his tail as a result.
Plastic– the ball– has a total identity crisis. What is a plastic, anyway? Readers aren’t sure either, as she is not identified by anymore than her name. Plastic can read, but the dictionary definition is inscrutable and the poor thing panics until the wise old bathroom towel Tuk Tuk sheds light on the situation. ”Plastic is just your name…It’s obvious, to anyone who knows anything, precisely what you are.”
Plastic: ”It is?”
Tuk Tuk: “I’ve seen balls before you, I’ll see balls after you. A ball is what you are. Tell me, do you bounce?”
Plastic: “Yes! I do?”
Tuk Tuk: “And do you roll?”
Plastic: “Yes!” (She rolls around the bathroom until she smashes into the base of the toilet.)
Tuk Tuk: “And have you got front legs and back legs?”
Plastic: “Um, not exactly.”
Tuk Tuk: “And no fur whatsoever?”
Plastic: “No.”
Tuk Tuk: “That’s normal for a ball, you know.”
Plastic: “What about how I don’t have very much nose?”
Tuk Tuk: “You mean, how you don’t have any nose?”
Plastic: “Um . . . yes.”
Tuk Tuk: ”I have been around a long time. I have never seen a ball with fur, or legs, or a nose. You’re a ball, Plastic. Don’t let anyone tell you different.”
Plastic: ”I’m a ball! A ball, ball, ball!”
Jenkins’ storytelling is tender.
Absurd.
Perfectly childlike.
If you know me at all, you know I hold nothing against potty humor or slacker middle-school boys in books. If those things get more youthful eyes scanning text, bring ‘em on. But there is something to be said for a good, old-fashioned story well told. Something to be cherished, like an old, gray Pink Bear.
Dear Max: Who Doesn’t Love to Read Other People’s Mail?
07 Sep 2010 Leave a Comment
in Great Mileage Builder, High interest
There are at least three things I love about Dear Max, by Sally Grindley.
1. First and foremost, because I’m a teacher and all, I love that the format sucks readers right into the book. Dear Max is a story told entirely in letters between Max (almost ten) and his favorite author, D.J. Lucas. Who doesn’t love to read other people’s mail? Max writes a fan letter, D.J. writes back, and a friendship begins. Max and D.J.’s letters are short, funny, honest, and touching in a way that makes the need for further narrative superfluous. For kids, the short and funny thing can lead to a great sense of accomplishment. Just today I used Dear Max with a reluctant reader I tutor. He didn’t really want to read it, but in 45 minutes he’d read me 35 pages! That’s great for reading self-esteem. As for the honest and touching business, well, that’s a bonus for us grown-ups.
2. This book nurtures a love for writing stories and is chockfull of great pointers for fledgling authors. The relationship between Max and D.J. gains momentum when Max, duly inspired by D.J.’s myriad bestsellers, decides to write a story and asks for her help. D.J. is under deadline herself, and invites Max to write his story while she writes her new book. I love when D.J. admits she often spends hours staring at the white page and that her ideas take quite some time to “brew.” The story Max writes about Grizzle, a bear too small to catch fish like he’s supposed to, and Chomp, the crocodile that bullies him, mirrors Max’s own struggles in school. Max is small and bullied by a thug named Hugo Broadbent– nicknamed Broadbottom by Max. The parallels are there, but D.J. and Grindley never connect the dots for readers. Which brings me to the third thing I love.
3. There’s so much story between the letters for readers to figure out, it’s captivating! At first, Max is just a 9-year-old fan of an author, but a few letters in we learn, “Christmas is the saddest time of year for my mum and me.” A few letters more, and we find Max’s father is gone from his life, though we don’t know why. Later, Max mentions he’s off to yet another boring trip to the hospital, where his doctor examines him as if he were a weird bug. As for D.J., turns out she’s a motorbike riding, skydiving author who’s fallen in love with a pilot, and who is clearly smitten with Max as well. Enough so that she takes a break from writing that new book to write a short story about an almost-ten-year-old boy. Readers finally learn Max’s father has died, but we never do learn what illness takes Max to the hospital and if it’s why he is so much smaller than his peers. The absence of the label brings to mind how pointless labels can be. In this way, it’s a book rich for discussion. And also in the way it models using art/creativity/writing as catharsis. No wonder it was shortlisted for three different book awards in Grindley’s native U.K.
This is a 3-book series, and the second finds Max ready to write a play at the same moment D.J.’s book is to be made into a movie. I highly recommend Bravo, Max. In the third book, Relax Max, Max and D.J. take on poetry. You’ll have a hard time finding it in the U.S., but when my book group wrote to Grindley’s publisher in the U.K., true to form, they sent us six copies free of charge– air mail! I am a fan.
Clarice Bean– Bridget Jones as a Youth? She’s Not Just for Girls!
30 Aug 2010 Leave a Comment
in Great Mileage Builder, High interest
You know what the Brits call pigs’ feet? Trotters. Are you picturing a bunch of pink pigs trotting around their pen right now? I am. I love that term! It’s perfect. I learned it reading Clarice Bean. Her stories are told in diary format, and have a sense of humor reminiscent of the Bridget Jones diaries. “Clarice Bean! Will you please come back down to Earth this instant!” That would be British school marm Mrs. Wilberton, teacher of Clarice and possessor of trotters (according to our narrator). Mrs. Wilberton is exasperated with Clarice yet again and old-school enough to broadcast it to the class every chance she gets. But don’t worry about Clarice. She’s a survivor. In her first book, Utterly Me, Clarice Bean, she’s quite full of moxie indeed, modeling herself after her favorite book character, Ruby Redfort, school girl detective. But when a book report contest provides an opportunity to win the class prize, Clarice is ready to rise to the challenge. And though she’s no academic match for her rival, goody-goody Grace Grapelli, Clarice is at the top of her game when the prize trophy vanishes and the mystery needs to be solved.
At their core, the Clarice Bean books are not vastly different from Judy Moody books or Ramona books: spunky, quirky character faces school daze problems and said spunk/quirkiness carries her through. But, what was groundbreaking about author/graphic artist Lauren Child’s style, back in ’02, was that she creatively exploited every available feature of the book she presented to her young audience to bring Clarice alive. That is, well before Dairy of a Wimpy Kid‘s Jeff Kinney brought us pages that have a sixth grader’s doodles in the margins and a font that looks like kid scrawl, Child infused the very print on the page– normal Times New Roman, or whatever– with an expressive quality reflective of Clarice’s unique voice. Bold print, italics, yeah, but how about swirling print and sideways print, with font size adjusted to match Clarice’s frame of mind? And using wonderful collage images in unconventional places to illustrate a point? I wish I could show you an example, because that’s the only way to do Child’s work justice, but, bear with me and picture this page:
I can’t concentrate because I am busy imagining Mrs. Wilberton as a hippopotamus, and I am writing [childlike scrawl font here]: Mrs. Wilberton is a hippipotimis. Mrs. Wilberton is a hippipotimis. over and over again without really meaning to. And what I am unaware of is that Mrs. Wilberton is standing behind me, reading it. She says, “Can anyone here correctly spell the word hippopotamus for Clarice Bean?” And here, barging in from the right side of the page is a photograph of a hippo with hand-drawn cat glasses, a la Wilberton. Clarice doesn’t say she pictured this. She doesn’t have to. The picture deepens our understanding of who Clarice is. And, personally, I can’t get enough of her.
Book two in the series, Clarice Bean Spells Trouble, won critical acclaim from librarians as well as kids. In it, there’s a spelling bee, a musical theater rendition of The Sound of Music (alas, our Clarice is stuck playing one of the nuns), and most heartwarming, a blooming friendship between Clarice and the class trouble-maker, Carl Wrenbury. Only Clarice, with her individualist nature and blatant disregard for authority, is willing to look beyond Karl’s behavior and extend the hand of friendship to a boy in need of understanding. Fewer illustrations but more heart, it’s a fantastic read.
Monty Python for the Twelve-and-Unders: Cressida Crowell
25 Aug 2010 4 Comments
in Great Mileage Builder, High interest, Targets Boys
I know, I know. You saw the movie. “It was a little sad,” I hear you say. “My kid cried,” you say. I have no idea what happened when How to Train a Dragon, by Cressida Cowell, was turned into a movie, but something seems to have been lost in translation. This book is funny. Monty bloody Python funny. It’s not sad. I didn’t see the movie, so I’m not criticizing it, I’m just sayin’, boys LOVE this book. It definitely will not make them cry, unless they are laughing so hard a few tears spring from their eyes. Girls like it, too, if you can get them past the overtly male window dressing (Colors of the dragon breed called the Gronkle: Snot green, bogey beige, pooey brown.) and into the bones of the story. Because deep down, it’s universally appealing. Unlikely hero, whose talents fly in the face of popular culture, overcomes bully-ish peers by virtue of said talent, and saves the day. It reminds me of Python’s Life of Brian, in which Brian is believed by a whole lot of folks to be the Messiah, and feels wholly unfit for the job. (In case you want to remember, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zjz16xjeBAA )
Only, nobody believes in Hiccup.
Hiccup is a Viking boy, heir to the royal throne. His father, the Chief of the Hairy Hooligans, casts a long shadow– he’s a fearsome sword warrior and esteemed leader of a crowd who favors brawn and bulkiness over all else. Hiccup is more of the introspective, intellectual sort of Viking. The problem is, of course, there is no such thing as an introspective, intellectual Viking, and most definitely no such thing as an introspective, intellectual Viking chief. Hiccup is routinely ridiculed by fellow tribesman, including his father. A rite of passage for all Viking boys is to tame a wild dragon to use in battle. The book opens with the boys being led into a cave to kidnap sleeping baby dragons during their hibernation season. The popular mode of training a dragon? Yell at it. The louder the better. Hiccup has a wimpy yell, and all his peers know his weakness. On top of that, he’s captured the smallest of all dragons– and it’s toothless, to boot. But Hiccup’s strength? He’s researched and studied, studied and researched, and mastered the Dragonese language. He’s a dragon whisperer.
What adult doesn’t want his/her child getting the message that brains overpower brawn? The best part is that it’s camouflaged in kid humor. The line-up of events at the “Thor’sday Thursday Celebration?” Hammer-throwing for the Over-60s only; How Many Gulls’ Eggs Can You Eat in One Minute? contest; Ugliest Baby Contest; Axe-fighting Display (“Admire the delicate art of fighting with axes.”).
A whole lot of fun, and just the beginning of a multi-book series. So forget the movie. The book is better (she says without having seen the first frame of the film). Isn’t the book always better?
What? Already finished the “Wimpy Kid” series?
22 Aug 2010 7 Comments
in High interest, Targets Boys
Another Maine author. It’s a great state, what can I say? Lincoln Pierce is a cartoonist/author whose comic strip (about–who else?– Big Nate) appears in over 200 US newspapers. Once your kid spots Big Nate In a Class By Himself on the bookstore or library shelf, you won’t be able to talk him/her out of it. And why would you? Matter of fact, I challenge you to put it down once you read page one. Go ahead, try. Read a sample.
Nate’s a great character, perhaps not one you want your kid to emulate, but definitely someone you’ll remember from your own middle school days. Nate, who tells his story through simple prose and comics, is a sixth grader imprisoned by middle school. Pierce has the voice of a middle school boy down pat. ”I think we can all agree that substitute teachers are almost always better than real teachers,” Nate pontificates. ”And by ‘better’ I mean ‘more clueless.’” When describing his dad, Nate notes he’s okay, not as psycho as some he’s seen at Little League games. But Dad, like many a substitute teacher, is clueless. ”Dad Fact: Dad handed out rice cakes for Halloween one year. That was also the year our house get egged. Connect the dots, Dad.”) Nate is sure he’s destined for better things than middle school is preparing him for. He read it in a fortune cookie.
Saying more about the book would be overkill. It’s a quick, hysterical read accessible to kids younger than sixth grade (I’d say third), and there are more Nate books on the horizon. Also, Pierce, being an artist at heart, maintains a fun, interactive website. Check it out! http://www.bignatebooks.com/books
Carl Hiaasen Keeps Them (and Us) White-knuckled
21 Aug 2010 3 Comments
in Experienced Reader/Upper Middle Grade, High interest
Chapter One is a short story in and of itself. A brilliant one. We’re in middle school biology class at a mediocre private day school in Florida, taught by the tyrannical Mrs. Starch– who, Hiaasen alerts us in sentence one, will mysteriously disappear the next day. But today, she’s twirling her Ticonderoga #2 pencil in a way that inspires fear among her students. Mrs. Starch is a take-no-prisoners, polyester-pant-suit-clad biology zealot, who “wears her dyed blond hair piled to one side of her head, like a sand dune.” She takes pleasure in grilling students on assigned reading and humiliating those who fail to answer correctly. Her target today is Smoke, the Truman School’s taciturn loner who, BTW, has a track record with pyromania. Suffice it to say he hasn’t done the reading, and what ensues is a tension fraught face-off, a bullfight performed in front of an otherwise law abiding class of kids. The incident, shared with us via the main character Nick, is horrifying both because the teacher finds it so easy to ruthlessly bait a student and because Smoke fumes (excuse the pun) with a dangerous anger unfit for a middle schooler. I won’t tell how it ends, but I will say I actually gasped I was so surprised. Gasped– no kidding.
Smoke doesn’t show up for the Biology field trip to the Black Vine Swamp the next day. Mrs. Starch disappears at the end of it. Was the piercing cry from the woods everyone heard a rare Florida panther, or something more sinister? Is it Smoke stalking Mrs. Starch? The half-hearted investigation put forth by Truman’s headmaster turns up nothing. Nick and his friend Marta, unsatisfied with the adults’ handling of the mystery, take it upon themselves to solve it. It’s a wild ride filled with vivid characters and pierced with heartbreaking realism (Nick’s Iraqi War veteran father, Smoke’s broken home). Nick and Marta manage not only to find Mrs. Starch and prove Smoke’s innocence, but uncover an illegal oil drilling scheme threatening the Black Vine Swamp and the endangered Florida panther.
Carl Hiaasen has won multiple awards for his books and frequents the NYT Bestseller List, so I may not be introducing you to anything new here. But if you and your favorite ‘tween don’t know him yet, it’s time. Hiaasen writes “eco-thrillers”– books in which empowered kids bring greedy, crooked, defilers of the natural world to justice. He’s a satirist at heart, and like the best of them he manages to walk the tightrope between the ridiculous and the painfully true, entertaining us all the while. It’s the kind of writing usually reserved for adult audiences. True, Scat, with its layered, fast-paced plot and multifaceted characters, is best suited to a 10+ audience, but it reminds us of how keen an eye young people have for seeing hypocrisy, and how sometimes it takes clear-eyed, youthful idealism to combat it.
Other books for kids by Hiaasen: Newbery Award Winner Hoot, and Flush, both highly recommended.














